# cubic — AI Coding Tool Review & Pricing > cubic is an AI-powered code review and security platform that integrates with GitHub to provide real-time pull request analysis and continuous whole-codebase scanning. It utilizes thousands of AI agents to detect bugs, enforce coding standards, and suggest fixes, while maintaining security through a no-training, SOC 2 compliant architecture. Source: https://ai.dosa.dev/tools/cubic · Updated Nov 1, 2026 · Category: AI Code Review & Security · Published by dosa.dev ## At a glance - **Tool**: cubic - **Company**: cubic - **Category**: [AI Code Review & Security](https://ai.dosa.dev/category/code-review) - **Pricing model**: Freemium - **Official website**: https://www.cubic.dev/ ## Key features - Continuous repository-wide codebase scanning - Learns from senior developers' past PR feedback - Plain-English custom review agent configuration - One-click remediation with background coding agents - Issue-tracker integration for context-aware reviews ## Pricing **Model**: Freemium Offers a free Starter plan with 20 PR reviews per month. Paid tiers include Team ($30/developer/month billed yearly), Pro ($79/developer/month billed yearly), and Max ($160/developer/month billed yearly), with custom Enterprise pricing available. Open source projects for public repositories are free. ## Who it is for - **Best for**: Development teams managing complex, multi-file codebases who need repository-wide context and automated, remediation-focused security and bug detection. - **Not ideal for**: Teams using version control platforms other than GitHub, as support is currently limited to GitHub repositories. ## Verdict A highly capable, research-backed AI tool that distinguishes itself by combining PR-level reviews with deep, long-running codebase analysis and actionable one-click remediation workflows. ## Recent updates As of September 2026, cubic updated its offering to include more reviewed lines in Team and Pro plans, lowered the cost of additional flex capacity, and increased the number of linkable repositories to five. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is cubic free? cubic is Freemium. Offers a free Starter plan with 20 PR reviews per month. Paid tiers include Team ($30/developer/month billed yearly), Pro ($79/developer/month billed yearly), and Max ($160/developer/month billed yearly), with custom Enterprise pricing available. Open source projects for public repositories are free. Check the official site for current plans. ### Is cubic open source? cubic is not listed as open source on ai.dosa.dev - it is Freemium. ### How much does cubic cost? Offers a free Starter plan with 20 PR reviews per month. Paid tiers include Team ($30/developer/month billed yearly), Pro ($79/developer/month billed yearly), and Max ($160/developer/month billed yearly), with custom Enterprise pricing available. Open source projects for public repositories are free. Pricing changes often - verify on the official site. ### Who is cubic best for? Development teams managing complex, multi-file codebases who need repository-wide context and automated, remediation-focused security and bug detection. ### Who is cubic not ideal for? Teams using version control platforms other than GitHub, as support is currently limited to GitHub repositories. ### What are the best cubic alternatives? The closest cubic alternatives on ai.dosa.dev are CodeRabbit, Qodo, Snyk Code - all listed under AI Code Review & Security. ### Who makes cubic? cubic is developed by cubic. It is listed in the AI Code Review & Security category on ai.dosa.dev. ## Top alternatives - [CodeRabbit](https://ai.dosa.dev/tools/coderabbit) (Freemium) — Engineering teams and organizations that utilize AI coding agents and require a central governance layer to validate, prioritize, and secure high-velocity code output. - [Qodo](https://ai.dosa.dev/tools/qodo-qodo) (Paid) — Enterprise engineering teams needing to enforce consistent coding standards and governance across multiple repositories, Git providers, and large-scale agentic workflows. - [Snyk Code](https://ai.dosa.dev/tools/snyk-code-snyk) (Freemium) — Developers and DevOps teams looking for fast, integrated security scanning that reduces remediation time by automatically suggesting fixes for source code vulnerabilities. - [Kodus](https://ai.dosa.dev/tools/kodus) (Freemium) — Mid-sized to enterprise teams that require highly customizable, context-aware code reviews and automated policy enforcement with strict data privacy requirements. - [Gito](https://ai.dosa.dev/tools/gito) (Open Source) — Engineering teams prioritizing data privacy and vendor neutrality, open-source maintainers, and developers seeking automated, consistent quality checks. - [Bubo](https://ai.dosa.dev/tools/bubo) (Open Source) — Engineering teams prioritizing code security, governance, and data privacy who want to run automated technical code reviews on their own infrastructure. - Full alternatives guide: https://ai.dosa.dev/tools/cubic/alternatives ## Head-to-head comparisons - [CodeRabbit vs cubic](https://ai.dosa.dev/compare/coderabbit-vs-cubic) (Markdown: https://ai.dosa.dev/compare/coderabbit-vs-cubic.md) - [Bubo vs cubic](https://ai.dosa.dev/compare/bubo-vs-cubic) (Markdown: https://ai.dosa.dev/compare/bubo-vs-cubic.md) - [cubic vs Gito](https://ai.dosa.dev/compare/cubic-vs-gito) (Markdown: https://ai.dosa.dev/compare/cubic-vs-gito.md)