logo Augment Code vs Cody

Augment Code vs Cody

Side-by-side comparison of Augment Code (Augment) and Cody (Sourcegraph) - pricing, key features, ideal use cases, recent updates, and verdicts.

IDE Extensions · Updated Sep 1, 2026
Augment Code
Augment
Paid

Augment Code is an AI-powered development platform featuring a proprietary Context Engine that provides agents with a deep, semantic understanding of large codebases. It enables automated workflows including code review, incident response, and end-to-end feature implementation across IDEs, CLI, and Slack.

Cody
Sourcegraph
Paid

Cody is an enterprise-grade AI coding assistant built on Sourcegraph's code intelligence platform, designed to provide deep context across large, multi-repository codebases. It serves as an in-IDE companion for chat, autocomplete, and code refactoring while offering robust security controls for large organizations.

How to choose
Choose Augment Code if

Large-scale enterprise codebases requiring deep architectural context, automated code review, and multi-agent coordinated development.

Skip if: Small-scale projects where per-task token costs and compute billing might outweigh the benefits of deep semantic indexing.

Choose Cody if

Large engineering organizations with massive, multi-repository codebases and strict security or data-residency requirements.

Skip if: Individual developers, small teams, or users seeking a highly autonomous, multi-step agentic IDE experience.

Detailed comparison
Augment Code vs Cody: pricing, features, and use cases compared
Augment Code Cody
Company Augment Sourcegraph
Category IDE Extensions & Plugins IDE Extensions & Plugins
Pricing Paid

Uses a flat-fee business plan at $100/month (including up to 50 seats) with usage-based billing for LLM tokens, 40% service fees, and compute, plus enterprise options.

Paid

Enterprise-only pricing via annual contract; reported as approximately $49-$59 per user per month, with platform deals starting around $16,000.

Key features
  • Context Engine for semantic codebase indexing and cross-repo dependency tracking
  • Agentic code review for pull requests and automated ticket-to-PR workflows
  • Auggie CLI for terminal-first interactive and automated development
  • Model-agnostic architecture supporting Claude, GPT-5, and Gemini variants
  • Context Engine MCP to bring semantic context to third-party agents
  • Multi-repository context retrieval
  • Admin-selectable frontier LLMs
  • Self-hosted and air-gapped deployment options
  • Context Filters for security-sensitive code
  • Zero-retention, no-train data guarantee
Best for Large-scale enterprise codebases requiring deep architectural context, automated code review, and multi-agent coordinated development. Large engineering organizations with massive, multi-repository codebases and strict security or data-residency requirements.
Not ideal for Small-scale projects where per-task token costs and compute billing might outweigh the benefits of deep semantic indexing. Individual developers, small teams, or users seeking a highly autonomous, multi-step agentic IDE experience.
Recent updates Launched Context Engine MCP to provide semantic codebase awareness to external agents like Cursor and Claude Code, alongside ongoing refinements to the Auggie CLI and Cosmos platform including expanded integration catalogs. Sourcegraph deprecated all individual Free and Pro tiers in mid-2025 to focus exclusively on enterprise deployments and its newer agentic product, Amp.
Verdict A top-tier, enterprise-grade AI coding platform that excels at delivering production-ready code through superior context management rather than just raw model power. Cody is the premier choice for enterprises needing AI that understands architectural dependencies across hundreds of repositories, though its high cost and lack of an individual on-ramp make it unsuitable for solo developers or small, single-repo teams.
FAQ
Is Augment Code or Cody free?

Augment Code is Paid; Cody is Paid. Check each tool's detail page for full pricing breakdowns.

Which should I choose, Augment Code or Cody?

Augment Code is best for Large-scale enterprise codebases requiring deep architectural context, automated code review, and multi-agent coordinated development. Cody is best for Large engineering organizations with massive, multi-repository codebases and strict security or data-residency requirements.

What is the main difference between Augment Code and Cody?

Augment Code (Augment) is listed as IDE Extensions & Plugins; Cody (Sourcegraph) is listed as IDE Extensions & Plugins. Augment Code is an AI-powered development platform featuring a proprietary Context Engine that provides agents with a deep, semantic understanding of large codebases. It enables a… By contrast, Cody is an enterprise-grade AI coding assistant built on Sourcegraph's code intelligence platform, designed to provide deep context across large, multi-repository codebases. It se…

All comparisons

Comparison content is generated from our enriched tool data. Verify pricing and features with each vendor before purchasing.