Augment Code vs Cody Augment Code vs Cody
Side-by-side comparison of Augment Code (Augment) and Cody (Sourcegraph) - pricing, key features, ideal use cases, recent updates, and verdicts.
Augment Code is an AI-powered development platform engineered specifically for large, complex, and long-lived codebases. It utilizes a proprietary Context Engine to build semantic dependency graphs across repositories, enabling agents to execute multi-step tasks with deep architectural awareness.
Cody is an enterprise-grade AI coding assistant that leverages Sourcegraph's code intelligence platform to provide context-aware suggestions across entire multi-repository codebases. It is designed for large engineering organizations that require deep codebase visibility, stringent data privacy, and secure deployment options.
Engineering teams working on large, complex, or polyglot codebases (100K+ files) that require high architectural awareness and enterprise-grade security compliance.
Skip if: Individual developers or teams working on greenfield or small-scale projects where the overhead of a context-heavy engine and complex credit-based pricing exceeds the value of simpler, editor-first alternatives.
Large engineering teams working with complex monorepos or distributed microservice architectures who need deep codebase context and enterprise-grade compliance.
Skip if: Individual developers, small teams, or organizations looking for low-cost, self-serve AI coding tools without existing Sourcegraph infrastructure.
| Augment Code | Cody | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Augment | Sourcegraph |
| Category | IDE Extensions & Plugins | IDE Extensions & Plugins |
| Pricing | Freemium Credit-based model with a free trial and paid tiers starting at $20/month (Indie), $60/month per developer (Standard), and $200/month per developer (Max), plus custom Enterprise pricing. | Paid Sold exclusively as an Enterprise offering starting at approximately $16,000 per year, scaling with team size and usage. |
| Key features |
|
|
| Best for | Engineering teams working on large, complex, or polyglot codebases (100K+ files) that require high architectural awareness and enterprise-grade security compliance. | Large engineering teams working with complex monorepos or distributed microservice architectures who need deep codebase context and enterprise-grade compliance. |
| Not ideal for | Individual developers or teams working on greenfield or small-scale projects where the overhead of a context-heavy engine and complex credit-based pricing exceeds the value of simpler, editor-first alternatives. | Individual developers, small teams, or organizations looking for low-cost, self-serve AI coding tools without existing Sourcegraph infrastructure. |
| Recent updates | Introduced the Claude Fable 5 model for deep reasoning, expanded the Context Engine MCP to integrate with third-party agents like Cursor and Claude Code, and shifted entirely to a credit-based pricing model to better reflect usage costs. | General availability of agentic context gathering, introduction of Agentic Batch Changes for large-scale migrations, and the launch of Code Finder for efficient file and line retrieval. |
| Verdict | Augment Code is the industry benchmark for AI-driven development at organizational scale, offering unparalleled codebase context that helps teams navigate legacy complexity and maintain high velocity. While its pricing and steep learning curve can be daunting, its ability to turn AI into a reliable, background-operating engineer makes it a powerhouse for complex enterprise environments. | Cody is a specialized, powerful tool for large-scale enterprise environments where deep codebase awareness and security are paramount; however, its enterprise-only pricing and infrastructure requirements make it unsuitable for individual developers. |
Is Augment Code or Cody free?
Augment Code is Freemium; Cody is Paid. Check each tool's detail page for full pricing breakdowns.
Which should I choose, Augment Code or Cody?
Augment Code is best for Engineering teams working on large, complex, or polyglot codebases (100K+ files) that require high architectural awareness and enterprise-grade security compliance. Cody is best for Large engineering teams working with complex monorepos or distributed microservice architectures who need deep codebase context and enterprise-grade compliance.
What is the main difference between Augment Code and Cody?
Augment Code (Augment) is listed as IDE Extensions & Plugins; Cody (Sourcegraph) is listed as IDE Extensions & Plugins. Augment Code is an AI-powered development platform engineered specifically for large, complex, and long-lived codebases. It utilizes a proprietary Context Engine to build semantic… By contrast, Cody is an enterprise-grade AI coding assistant that leverages Sourcegraph's code intelligence platform to provide context-aware suggestions across entire multi-repository codebas…
Comparison content is generated from our enriched tool data. Verify pricing and features with each vendor before purchasing.